Am Samstag, den 10.12.2011, 12:35 +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier:
> owner 650840 !
> thanks
>
> On 2011-12-03 22:02, Alessio Treglia wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian....@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hi!
> >
>
> Hi,
>
> > The new upstream release 3.0.3 of the package zita-convolver is sitting in
> > experimental since many weeks and now I feel comfortable to state it's ready
> > to join Debian unstable.
> >
>
> Is this a clean ABI bump or are there API changes as well?
from the release notes :
"
This release is NOT binary compatible with 2.0.0.
This release is NOT API compatible with 2.0.0. The
required changes are small but essential,
"
>
> > Few packages would be affected by this small transition:
> >
> > ir.lv2
> > jconvolver
>
> Can these just be binNMU'ed or will any of them need source uploads?
>
> > guitarix
> >
>
> hermann, you say a rebuild should work for guitarix - is that a clean
> binNMU or a source upload?
No source upload is needed to rebuild guitarix against zita-convolver
3.0.3.
Now, guitarix(version 0.20.2-2) used zita-convolver v.3. witch is
included in the upstream source package and patched by the debian
maintainer to solved the bug #649634.
As soon, zita-convolver 3.0.3 is available in the build system, guitarix
will auto prefer to use the system package during (./waf)
configure/build.
More over, guitarix will continue to work fine also when no rebuild
happen and zita-convolver 3.0.3 hit sid.
Then, guitarix will switch to use the system package when the next
upstream release enter debian.
greets
hermann
>
> > Thanks in advance for any reply.
> >
> > [...]
>
> ~Niels
>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1323520626.2232.32.camel@box
