On Wed, 2011-11-23 at 13:20 +0900, Mattia Dongili wrote: > just finished giving it a go on a squeeze virtual machine (yay for > national holidays!!). > loadcpufreq (the one with all the changes mentioned above) obviously > cannot detect a supported cpu but all the changed code is executed fine. > Attached a verbose log of the execution. > > cpufrequtils (007-2+squeeze1) stable; urgency=low
The version for stable needs to be lower than the version in testing - convention would be -1+squeeze1 (or -2~squeeze1 at a push). With that change, please go ahead; thanks. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1322320324.16684.15.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
