Hi Adam (2011.09.17_18:09:13_+0200) > If you're going to do that, you need to either (preferably) CC the > receiving package on your mail, or send a separate mail. What tends to > happen (as in this case) is that the control@ reassign gets processed > after the rest of the mail has been received and the new package only > gets the control@ output with no other information.
Fair point, thanks :) > One quick question - doesn't this change: > > + - logfile-visibility-567576.patch: Channels must be explicitly configured > + to have publicly readable logs. (LP: #567576) > > have the potential to at least confuse users who are expecting the logs > to be created in a publicly readable manner? Yes. This was the simplest fix to the problem, and probably how things should have been from the start. I don't think there is a regression-free fix to the bug, as the bot cannot know whether it is speaking to a public channel or a private message, when it speaks first. (Even on IRC, not all channels are required to have names starting with #) SR -- Stefano Rivera http://tumbleweed.org.za/ H: +27 21 465 6908 C: +27 72 419 8559 UCT: x3127 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110920103352.gp19...@bach.rivera.co.za
