Your message dated Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:04:46 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#638463: RM: tulip/3.1.2-2.3
has caused the Debian Bug report #638464,
regarding RM: deps/0.13-1.1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
638464: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=638464
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: [email protected]
Usertags: rm
Please remove deps from testing. It is the only package (libdeps-renderer-
tulip-perl) which has a dependency on tulip and therefore also prevents the
transition of glew.
It has a low popcount (~60) and no rdeps. This was also the reason why it was
removed in 2008 from testing
http://packages.qa.debian.org/d/deps/news/20080904T163917Z.html
It seems that it is a possible solution because it was suggested by Phillipp
Kern.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 15:24:25 +0200, Clara Gnos wrote:
> Please remove tulip from testing. Around a half year, different RC bugs
> (FTBFS; #556508, #615687, #616282, #638169) are open and nothing seems to be
> happen there. It is also heavily outdated.
>
On Fri, Aug 19, 2011 at 15:24:27 +0200, Clara Gnos wrote:
> Please remove deps from testing. It is the only package (libdeps-renderer-
> tulip-perl) which has a dependency on tulip and therefore also prevents the
> transition of glew.
>
Removal hint added.
Cheers,
Julien
--- End Message ---
