2011/8/8 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: > I assume via X-Debbugs-Cc?
Yes. 2011/8/8 Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org>: > The short thread starting at > http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2011/06/msg00154.html may be > helpful. I'm afraid I haven't had time to work through Adam's concern; > do you think you might have time to chase down whether those fixes are > sound in unstable (perhaps some of the bug reporters have a different > problem)? Sure. Following up to Adam's reply in that thread: 2011/6/12 Adam D. Barratt <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk>: > The diff looks okay; thanks. Looking at the bug logs, it appears that > these two changes are currently unfixed in unstable: > > > + - Handle Xen split-partition disk image devices (closes: 601974). > > + - Check RAID superblock offset (closes: #610184). > > Is that correct? Having the patches applied and verified in unstable is > usually a pre-requisite to applying them to stable. I had a look at those two bugs: #601974 is indeed fixed in unstable, it wasn't closed in changelog because the fix was applied directly to upstream (and included with 1.99-1 upload). I've closed that bug and put everyone involved on CC. #610184 might not be fixed in unstable according to this report: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=610184#64 . Given the situation I wouldn't include it in this proposed update. Adam, you didn't mention #609804 in your mail. Is that one ok? -- Robert Millan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/caofdtxoyvhpsovbpqncr6br5dz1yypaxvfuldrsnshquhg6...@mail.gmail.com
