Hi Bill, sorry for the delay in getting back to you.
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 16:29:17 +0200, Bill Allombert wrote: > One issue with this transition is that a number of packages still depends on > libjpeg62-dev instead of libjpeg-dev. This might cause packages to have > uninstallable > build-dependency until they are fixed. > I guess that depends if we need to keep building some things against libjpeg62. If not, maybe libjpeg62-dev can become a dummy transitional package for libjpeg8-dev. If yes, then those packages depending on libjpeg62-dev should have bugs filed (probably at important severity for now). Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110609203837.gq2...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
