tags 624928 = fixed-upstream thanks At Mon, 16 May 2011 20:00:59 -0700, Matt Kraai wrote: > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libobjc.so.2, needed by > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.6.1/../../../../lib/libgnustep-base.so, may > conflict with libobjc.so.3
Argh, it looks like I missed the moment when GCC 4.6 became the default compiler; apologies for the slightly inadequate comments at #624928. > When I build the package in wheezy, I see no such warning and the > executables run fine. Yep, that's because gcc-defaults hasn't migrated yet. > Is a transition and/or new upload of gnustep-base required to fix > this? Definitely. I suggest to upload 1.22.0 (which has proper support for the 4.6 ObjC runtime) to experimental along with the rest of the GNUstep stack and prepare for transition (combined gnustep-base + gnustep-gui + libobjc). We'll do the usual tests and fix all known bugs in advance. The alternative is to backport the support for the new runtime and patch -base 1.20.2, then have only a libobjc2->3 transition. Probably doable, but too much work, and the result may end up binary incompatible (in theory it should not, though). It is also not a very motivating job considering a GNUstep transition is being planned anyway. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/878vu5au5h.GNUs_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org
