severity 625521 normal thanks First: thanks again to all who helped me with this bug.
On Thu, May 12, 2011 at 03:50:57PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote: > Hi Steve, > sorry if you already received my last mail, but could you please > justify severity critical for this bug? Thanks to the help of Michel Dänzer, the concensus is that the bug is really in the fbdev driver. > Now that it is assigned to > X, the report does not prevent a glibc migration from happening > starting in 5 days. If this bug warrants delaying glibc's migration > to wheezy, please inform the release team. Since the bug is exhibited with libc6 2.11, I don't think this bug is a reason to hold glibc. Bug #625522 may be, however (if accurate). > Furthermore, this report > now prevents migration of xorg-server. Is this a regression? So far > nobody other than you reported experiencing this problem, and the > bug seems to have no effect worst than preventing X startup. I don't know whether it's a regression, but the bug was exposed by a configuration that is perhaps unusual. And yes, the bug effect is to prevent X startup. -Steve
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
