Hi, 2011/4/26 Neil McGovern <n...@halon.org.uk>: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:58:24PM +0900, Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote: >> > We don't have faster hardware. >> > We think of a too slow thing in a question.... >> >> A test of gcc of sh4 takes time. >> When there is not a test, a package is done in about two days. >> >> How does sh4 become targeted for the release architecture? >> Can sh4 disable gcc test? >> > > I woudn't be particularly happy with that unless the gcc maintainers ok > it, and I'm still not sure that two days is also an acceptable > timescale.
Hmm. > > Have you tried a SH4A with a dual core? At the moment, I think that this > issue is severe enough that it can't be a release architecture. (Note > that if it is solved, there may be other problems, but we can get to > those later.) No. I have the board which this CPU on. However, I cannot use it for Buildd because this is for development. Is buildd using distcc accommodate? If it is a cause that speed of buildd is slow, Debian may not support the CPU for embedded. Best regards, Nobuhiro > > Neil > -- > A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion > Q. Why is top posting bad? > gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li A40F862E > -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/banlktikedcya4obc2kefijtdb+aacyx...@mail.gmail.com
