-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi there,
I'm writing in regards to bug 612914. In a nutshell, libfinance-quotehist-perl 1.14 FTBFS in stable due to faulty unit tests that are run during the build process. This bug if fixed in libfinance-quotehist-perl 1.16 in testing/unstable. The only changes in 1.16 are the fixes to the unit tests. I'm being told that this bug needs to be fixed in a stable update, but I don't see anything in section 5.5.1 of the developer's reference to imply that a FTBFS bug by itself merits a stable update. The package works fine aside from the FTBFS. So my question is, does a FTBFS bug in the stable version of a package where the package is fully functional and installable on all architectures merit a stable update? Please CC me. I'm not subscribed to this list. Thanks -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk3Gx+oACgkQBYeybkXz+/lohwCdHbhCVPv0xcmkcENFUWCs8mtg n6oAoMXdIe6FKc1OajNtdJVW0snWNAFp =L74B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4dc6c7f2.6020...@debian.org
