On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 12:57 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 06:31 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > On Sun, 2011-03-27 at 20:31 +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > There were a couple of regressions in linux-2.6 version 2.6.32-31 (i.e. > > > > Debian 6.0.1) that should be fixed a.s.a.p: [...] > > The kernel's now built everywhere; thanks for following up on that. As > > this is the first time that we've actively pushed a non-security stable > > kernel update outside of the point release route, we'd prefer that it be > > opened to testing from a wider selection of users than most p-u kernels > > receive. [...] > I think there's still a Xen regression (since 2.6.32-31) to be fixed.
I'm assuming that's #621072, which it looks like a resolution has been found for? Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1303749327.3323.5870.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
