On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 23:54 +0200, Mehdi Dogguy wrote:
> On 04/24/2011 11:43 PM, Mark-Willem Jansen wrote:
> >
> > Nice, the hint worked and pulled most of the EFL's into testing
> > except for efreet. And I do not get why. The excuses say that
> > updating efreet introduces new bug: #618502. This bug was due to a
> > fault in the ecore source package, but it has been resolved.
> >
>
> Yes, but, aiui, it's assigned to efreet, marked as fixed in ecore, but
> is not fixed in efreet. The bts has no way to know that this situation
> is okay. One has to reassign the bug to ecore, where it should have been
> assigned. Did that now. It _should_ be okay for the next run.
efreet | 1.0.0-1 | testing | source
efreet | 1.0.0-1 | unstable | source
i.e. yes, that worked.
Regards,
Adam
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive:
http://lists.debian.org/1303728428.3323.4570.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
