On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 23:32:17 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 09:30:23PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > We should keep both SONAMES in sid and wheezy for now, IMO. So I think > > that means first upload openssl 1.0.0 as a new source package without > > the -dev (this can probably happen now). Then when that's in testing > > and you get an ack, switch the -dev from 0.9.8 to 1.0.0. > > If all you want to do is to have both libssl0.9.8 and libssl1.0.0 > both in testing at the same time, I don't see why you want to do > it like that. I could just upload a openssl098 source package > just containing libssl0.9.8(-dbg), and have the openssl source > package provide libssl1.0.0 and libssl-dev. It shouldn't take > that long for the openssl098 pacakge to migrate to testing. > Yeah I guess that would probably work too. I'd just like to avoid anything getting blocked behind this...
Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110323144410.gu3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
