Sorry for not answering earlier. On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 23:37:13 +0000, Neil Williams wrote:
> gnome-pilot is orphaned but there is a new upstream release, I'm > looking at a QA upload (as I did the last one). Ubuntu have packaged it > but not changed the package name. Formerly it was libgnome-pilot2 but > now that library has a SONAME of 5 and the library package includes two > other libraries, SONAME 3 and SONAME 4. > > ./usr/lib/libgpilotd.so.5 > ./usr/lib/libgpilotdcm.so.4 > ./usr/lib/libgpilotdconduit.so.3 > It's usually better to have each library in a separate package. Makes it possible to handle an SONAME bump in one of them and not the others. > AFAICT the only reverse dependency is gnome-pilot-conduits which I've > also updated, but won't upload yet. > > Changes are in SVN: > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/ext-maint/gnome-pilot/trunk/?op=log > > http://svn.debian.org/wsvn/collab-maint/ext-maint/gnome-pilot-conduits/trunk/?op=log > > I propose to change gnome-pilot to build libgnome-pilot5_2.32.0-1 which > will have to go through NEW. > > Are there any problems with this mini-transition if gnome-pilot-conduits > is not uploaded until gnome-pilot has cleared NEW? (Neither package can > migrate without the other as migrating new gnome-pilot will break > installations of existing gnome-pilot-conduits.) > Looks like that's blocked by 1) gnome-pilot FTBFS on kfreebsd-* 2) #614489 in gnome-pilot-conduits Cheers, Julien -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110322000945.gr3...@radis.liafa.jussieu.fr
