On So, 2010-11-14 at 17:38 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2010-11-14 at 12:06 -0400, David Bremner wrote: > > On Sat, 23 Oct 2010 17:08:22 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" > > <a...@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-10-10 at 14:33 -0300, David Bremner wrote: > > > > > > My preference would be to see if the fixes for data loss, crashes, etc. > > > are backportable to the current version in the archive. A quick look > > > through the git log shows many more commits than I'd imagine correspond > > > to the fixes mentioned but I obviously don't know the codebase well > > > enough to tell if a sequence of commits might correspond to a single > > > fix. > > > > I have prepared a potential upload for testing-proposed-updates > > cherry-picking most but not all of the fixes mentioned in Patrick's > > previous messages. > > Thanks for that. > > > - Nokia E55: needs absolute alarm times (MBC #1657) > > - Nokia phones: alarm times in UTC, sending PHOTO (BMC #1657, #5860) > > Does the latter of these not render the former redundant?
I haven't looked at the specific patches that were cherry-picked, but yes, the older patch was for a specific model while the more general one was made later. No harm in having the device-specific patch applied, it simply becomes redundant. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1289764374.8158.102.ca...@pohly-mobl1.ikn.intel.com
