On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:14 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote:
> > + echo "Warning: tumgreyspf.postinst had found an old 
> > /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf,"
> > + echo "and will be deleting it as this version of the package doesn't use 
> > the"
> > + echo "old python script, but a new sh script in 
> > /etc/cron.daily/tumgreyspf."
> > 
> > Might I suggest something more along the lines of
[...]
> > You should probably also only remove the old file if it's the version
> > which was shipped by the package.
> 
> I've used the above suggested wording.

You're still unconditionally removing /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf without
checking whether the user has modified it, however.

When was the switch from cron.d to cron.daily made?  That wasn't clear
from the changelog.

Regards,

Adam


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: 
http://lists.debian.org/1283372215.606.1190.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net

Reply via email to