On Fri, 2010-08-27 at 16:14 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-26 at 13:55 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > > + echo "Warning: tumgreyspf.postinst had found an old > > /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf," > > + echo "and will be deleting it as this version of the package doesn't use > > the" > > + echo "old python script, but a new sh script in > > /etc/cron.daily/tumgreyspf." > > > > Might I suggest something more along the lines of [...] > > You should probably also only remove the old file if it's the version > > which was shipped by the package. > > I've used the above suggested wording.
You're still unconditionally removing /etc/cron.d/tumgreyspf without checking whether the user has modified it, however. When was the switch from cron.d to cron.daily made? That wasn't clear from the changelog. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1283372215.606.1190.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net