Hi Julien, hi Ray, On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 01:45:18PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 18:59:13 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 19:25:45 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > > > > > Hi Release Team, > > > > > > Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 10:06:31 +0200, Micha Lenk wrote: > > > >> Please see the attached debdiff of the changes that I would like to > > > >> make > > > >> to the package in Squeeze (via unstable). Please approve for upload. > > > >> > > > > Please upload, and get back to us when the package has been accepted. > > > > > > Gnucash 2.2.9-7 has just been accepted. > > > > > And unblocked. > > > It picked up a dependency on new goffice: > gnucash (2.2.9-6 to 2.2.9-7) > Maintainer: Thomas Bushnell, BSG > Too young, only 8 of 10 days old > Ignoring block request by freeze, due to unblock request by jcristau > Not considered > Depends: gnucash goffice (not considered) > > goffice (0.8.8-1 to 0.8.9-1) > Maintainer: J.H.M. Dassen (Ray) > 10 days old (needed 10 days) > Not touching package due to block request by freeze (contact > debian-release if update is needed) > Not considered > > Is the new goffice supposed to get in squeeze, or do we have to go > through t-p-u for gnucash?
I was not aware that there was a new goffice package uploaded to unstable without an unblock request. Ray, was the upload intended for the Squeeze release (and you just forgot to ask Debian Release for a freeze exception) or is it intended for Debian sid only? Regards, Micha -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100829143401.ga14...@mail.lenk.info
