On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 08:56:46PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sun, 2010-08-15 at 16:13 +0100, Dominic Hargreaves wrote: > > To the untrained eye, the diff between > > 6732c0e8ccb4d57d6a970973f994a9d2d3509def > > and > > 3b2738befa7fe934d0d55b77fe1fcf28aafbe424 > > > > in upstream git is what's required for this, but the patch would need > > a bit of work to apply cleanly. Note also that there > > are some memory leaks fixed in 2.25 which might be a good idea to fix > > too. > > > > Given all this, might the best idea be allow an exception for the > > new upstream? The full changelog is: > > Most of the changes sound potentially worthy of inclusion. What does > the debdiff look like?
Hi, I haven't had a look at this yet (just for context, I'm not the maintainer - happy for them to speak up :) I will try and look at this at the weekend though. Cheers, Domniic. -- Dominic Hargreaves | http://www.larted.org.uk/~dom/ PGP key 5178E2A5 from the.earth.li (keyserver,web,email) -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100824171100.gj4...@urchin.earth.li
