I'm a bit late with this but I didn't have the time and energy before my
vacation and some things came up very late. Do you think I can get the
following changes into squeeze (I haven't uploaded to unstable yet):


cvsd (1.0.19) UNRELEASED; urgency=low

  * cvsd-buildroot: ignore commented out lines in CVSROOT/passwd files
  * cvsd-buildroot: set an umask for generated files
  * some documentation updates
  * change init script dependency on $remote_fs (for /usr) from Should
    to Required (thanks lintian)
  * upgrade to standards-version 3.9.1 (no changes needed)
  * switch to "3.0 (native)" format

These are not extremely critical but all are very minor changes and it
would be nice to get them fixed for the next stable release. The init
script change addresses a release goal.


nss-pam-ldapd (0.7.8) UNRELEASED; urgency=low

  * minor portability improvements and cleanups (thanks Alexander V.
    Chernikov and Ted C. Cheng)
  * don't expand variables in rest of ${var:-rest} and ${var:+rest}
    expressions if it is not needed (closes: #592320)
  * libpam-ldapd.postinst: offer to add ldap to shadow in nsswitch.conf
    if a potential broken configuration is found (closes: #592104)
  * merge the suggests of libnss-ldapd and libpam-ldapd into those of
    the nslcd package to have a single consistent list of PAM
    alternatives for libnss-ldapd (closes: #591773)
  * add libpam-sss as an alternative to libpam-ldapd (closes: #591773)
  * upgrade to standards-version 3.9.1 (no changes needed)

#592320 is minor but a very simple fix, #592104 is important and could
affect a number of users and may be hard to track down for users,
#591773 is important for Debian Edu and all other changes are very minor
and well tested. The change for #592104 will probably require another
upload with translation updates.


python-stdnum (0.2-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low

  * New upstream release:
    - rename validate() function to is_valid() for all modules
    - handle wrong types passed to is_valid() more gracefully
    - add more tests and fix some minor bugs

Neither of these is critical but I would rather not have python-stdnum
0.1 in stable. This package is not important for stable, there are no
reverse dependencies yet and it is very new. Perhaps removing it from
squeeze is the best.


Should I upload these packages to unstable? Thanks for your time.

-- 
-- arthur - adej...@debian.org - http://people.debian.org/~adejong --

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply via email to