# See also http://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2010/03/msg00226.html retitle 561944 transition: libgnustep-base1.19 -> 1.20; libgnustep-gui0.16 -> 0.18 thanks
Updating my initial information: On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 02:59:53PM +0200, Yavor Doganov wrote: > Expected problems: > * This transition is combined with the removal of the defoma > dependency in gnustep-back, so there might be regressions we don't > know about yet. TTBOMK defoma-free gnustep-back is working properly. > * adun.app reliably fails to build on mipsen, which looks like is due > to a regression in binutils (#519006). GCC actually; I added a workaround in debian-med's SVN; untested as I don't have access to a mipsen box. > * gobjc-4.4 regression on armel: #550049 AFAICT this is fixed, although there was no explicit confirmation from the GCC maintainers: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?msg=12;bug=550049 > * The problems that the release team had in the past with GNUstep > transitions and involved Objective-C libraries/frameworks (see > subthread [1] if you forgot about this issue) are addressed, pending > sponsorship of the fixed packages [2]. All sponsored now. > * Packages which FTBFS with the new gnustep-gui or for other reasons: The full bug list here: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?which=tag&users=pkg-gnustep-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org&data=gnustep-transition Total 33 -- 28 fixed; 5 outstanding, of which 3 with patches, 1 pending and 1 fixed upstream. gnustep-base/1.20.1, gnustep-gui/0.18.0 and gnustep-back/0.18.0 are in experimental. Looking forward to your approval for the transition. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100626142020.ga4...@yavor.doganov.org
