retitle 577101 transition: libwpd8c2a -> libwpd-0.9-9 (and libwp{s,g}-0.1-1 ->
libwp{s,g}-0.2-2)
tag 577101 + squeeze-ignore
thanks
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 02:09:23PM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> If the whole point is to silence a lintian warning then I don't think
> it's worth it.
I personally disagree, we should follow best practives if possible.
> You can override the warning
Nah, I'll not override valid warnings.
> and if the SONAME gets bumped at some point you'll get rid of it.
OK, so we discussed this on IRC yesterday and though I still think it would
be worthwile and not much hassle I can live with it not being done for squeeze.
squeeze+1 probably will get a libwpd 0.8->0.9 change with API/ABI-changes
anyway (and with it a 0.1->0.2 transition for libwp{s,g}).. I am not
yet sure whether I am going to upload libwpd 0.9 (and libwp{s,g} 0.2) to sid
before squeeze (we need them in parallel anyways in the beginning of squeeze+1,
I don't think all apps will switch quickly)
Grüße/Regards,
René
--
.''`. René Engelhard -- Debian GNU/Linux Developer
: :' : http://www.debian.org | http://people.debian.org/~rene/
`. `' r...@debian.org | GnuPG-Key ID: D03E3E70
`- Fingerprint: E12D EA46 7506 70CF A960 801D 0AA0 4571 D03E 3E70
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100625115535.gd10...@rene-engelhard.de
