Hi, On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 17:52 +0100, Manuel Prinz wrote: > The current plan is to EOL MPICH and LAM by removing all reverse > dependencies on those packages. One big step in this direction would be > via mpi-defaults. The current version depends on LAM/MPI for arches > where Open MPI is not supported (yet). A package is prepared that will > depend on MPICH2 on these arches. After uploading that, binNMUs are > needed for the depending packages.
How is this transition progressing? I note that there are still 10 open bugs listed at [1]. > [1] > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=old-mpi-eol;users=debian-scie...@lists.debian.org Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1275501966.563.844.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
