On Wed, 2010-04-07 at 23:34 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:29 +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, March 25, 2010 08:27, Fathi Boudra wrote: > > >> Please go ahead with the upload to unstable; we'll then schedule the > > >> binNMUs. > > > > > > Upload to unstable done. > > > > It's now made it out of NEW, so I've scheduled the binNMUs (with > > appropriate dep-waits). > > A quick status update...
and another :) The directfb packages had an undeclared file conflict on armel. This is now fixed and the updated version built everywhere (and mostly uploaded). > Most of the binNMUs are now built. Unfortunately many of them ended up > built against the old libraries on mipsel; they have now been > rescheduled after the chroot was cleaned. This is all done. > gst-plugins-bad0.10 ends up tying the directfb and celt transitions > together. celt isn't ready to migrate as opal FTBFS on hppa but if it > comes to it we may temporarily break opal/hppa in testing. This is still the case, and we're still looking at temporary breakage for opal (and by extension ekiga and the gnome metapackages) on hppa. > The other big blocker is the two RC bugs against libsdl1.2. #572420 > looks like it could be fairly easily solved by simply disabling altivec > support; this should fix the crashes on machine where it isn't > available. This isn't a blocker. The bug is still RC but also applies to the package in testing and therefore isn't relevant for migration. > I believe I've found the upstream change responsible for #565788; > there's a patch in the BTS which will hopefully be being tested by > someone involved in Wesnoth soon. There's been a libsdl1.2 upload incorporating this change. It's built successfully everywhere and just waiting for a few uploads. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1271536590.14879.163.ca...@kaa.jungle.aubergine.my-net-space.net
