Hallo Andrew, am Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 01:21:10PM +0800 hast du folgendes geschrieben: > > As tasksel needs lxde-core this would transiently break it, which is > > denoted by the tasksel-meta-faux package which is semi-automatically[*] > > generated out of tasksel's data. > Would the be possible to unblock lxde-common 0.5 package into squreeze > so that users won't get a break system after upgrade and may get more > users to test it? And I'd update lxpanel package and make it builds on > both kfreebsd-amd64 and kfreebsd-i386 then.
I suppose lxde-common without lxpanel doesn't make much sense? Apart from that you could also denote the dependency with "[!kfreebsd-i386 !kfreebsd-amd64]" until it's ported. This is a kludge, agreed, but a simple unblock won't do. (It's either force-hinting the package in despite the broken dep of tasksel-meta-faux or temporarily editing the fake package.) Apart from that lxpanel seems non-binNMUable for menu-cache 0.3.2-2, because the dev package was renamed, see [1]. So that needs a sourceful upload anyway. Kind regards, Philipp Kern [1] https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=lxpanel -- .''`. Philipp Kern Debian Developer : :' : http://philkern.de Stable Release Manager `. `' xmpp:p...@0x539.de Wanna-Build Admin `- finger pkern/k...@db.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
