On 17/03/10 at 09:49 +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Lucas Nussbaum <lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net> writes: > [test builds for mpi-default switch to mpich2] > > The following 11 packages failed to build: > > apbs looks for mpi.h in the wrong place > > blacs-mpi missing target 'build-mpich2' in debian/rules > > gdcm ? > > igstk No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so' (?) > > kwwidgets No rule to make target `/usr/lib/libmpi_cxx.so' > > life matrixpetsc.hpp:49: error: using typ edef-name 'MPI_Win' after > > 'struct' > > mumps ld: cannot find -lblacs-mpich2 > > petsc Nonexistent directory: /usr/lib/mpich2 for key with-mpi-dir (?) > > pgapack cd: 4: can't cd to lib/linux/ > > rmpi configure: error: "Cannot find mpi.h header file" > > scalapack missing target 'build-mpich2' in debian/rules > > Could bugs about these issues be filed (with a usertag, so we can track > them)? > > > So, it looks like it is mostly build system bugs, and it should not be > > too hard to fix. > > Good to know, thanks for your work. > > I would propose that all (or at least) most of these bugs should be > fixed before we actually do the switch in unstable. Manuel, does that > seem OK to you?
Erm. I'm very reluctant to filing bugs that can't easily be reproduced in unstable. At this point, you need a custom mpi-defaults package to reproduce them. Also, it is possible that some of them will not be fixable before the new mpi-defaults is in unstable (= you can't upload a fixed package that works if the new mpi-defaults isn't in unstable). -- | Lucas Nussbaum | lu...@lucas-nussbaum.net http://www.lucas-nussbaum.net/ | | jabber: lu...@nussbaum.fr GPG: 1024D/023B3F4F | -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20100317122418.ga14...@xanadu.blop.info
