On Sat, Jan 9, 2010 at 7:26 AM, Andreas Barth <a...@not.so.argh.org> wrote: > * Andreas Barth (a...@not.so.argh.org) [091007 14:43]: >> There are still more issues with hppa popping up than with other >> architectures, but the general direction looks promising. For this >> reason, we have decided that we try to avoid the additional burden of >> packages getting out of sync, and keep hppa in our list of "normal >> supported architectures" at this time. We are only able to keep it >> this way if the good work continues, the switch to ntpl happens etc >> etc - I definitly hope it will work out well. > > Summarizing after quite some more time: Things look much better. As > you all know, there was recently e.g. the kde4libs-issue, and I expect > similar issues to happen again (as the migration to the new threading > model was very recently), but hppa is mostly normal again. > > We also need to get paer back as "normal" porter box (instead of > buildd as currently) (this shouldn't be troublesome in any way, just > needs to happen). > > I want to say "Thank you" for that great progress we achieved with > hppa. Thanks!
Thanks. Please remember to help the porters get visibility into those issues that are highest priority for debian. Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
