On 2009-09-19 19:20 +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 02:32:51PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: >> * Pierre Habouzit (madco...@madism.org) [090919 01:08]: >> > I'll put blocks in my hint file to be sure that both those packages will >> > migrate in testing together (I'm unsure if britney is clever enough to >> > block them until all the binNMUs are done, I don't think it is). Then >> > please ask for binNMUs of all the package that B-D on libjpeg-dev. Then >> > we will let that migrate. >> >> The question is: Are libjpeg62 and libjepg7 co-useable? (This only >> works if symbol versioning is turned on.) > > Huh, libjpeg62 and libjpet7 have different so-name so they are > co-installable. I don't get what you mean with "co-useable" and it > certainly has nothing to do with symbol versioning.
It has. If the symbols are not versioned, bad things may happen if both libraries are loaded into a process' address space. Sven -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
