* dann frazier (da...@debian.org) [090911 22:35]: > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:01:24PM -0600, LaMont Jones wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 02:06:36PM -0400, Carlos O'Donell wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:06 PM, dann frazier<da...@dannf.org> wrote: > > > What happened to sarti? Loosing a box like that would certainly add > > > load to the others. > > > > Sarti failed to power on one day. > > > > > >> >> Are you allowed to boot a kernel/initrd that I send you? > > > >> > I don't see why not, assuming these changes don't add a risk of > > > >> > producing bad binaries. > > > >> To be safe, I think we should be throwing away the packages built when > > > >> running the instrumented kernel. Is there a way we can do that? Can > > > >> you find that out for me? > > > > That would probably need to be answered by LaMont - he's the buildd > > > > admin for these boxes. > > > OK, I'll wait for LaMont to comment. > > > > Simplest way is to change ~buildd/.forward-porters (or whatever it is) > > to not send the logs to me. second best would be to tell me what not to > > upload. :-( > > That would prevent it from getting uploaded, but won't that package > get marked as built, preventing other buildds from trying?
It won't prevent the package from being moved from Needs-Build to some other state with that effect. Easiest to avoid that is to just push a bunch of packages into buildd/REDO, and disable access to wanna-build (that will also definitly prevent that packages are being uploaded). Cheers, Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
