Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2009-08-11 at 20:35 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>> On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 14:29 +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >>>> glib2.0 has been in unstable for 41 days, according to [1] >>>> >>>> Could it be unblocked so that it migrates to testing? >>> Unblocked, after ack from Otavio. >>> >>> You'll need to get ftp-master to remove the old libgio-fam binaries on >>> the Linux architectures before it will migrate though. >> reportbug has told me I should mail this list with this subject. > > It's wrong, or you asked it the wrong question.
Yeah, I did. I selected ROM and testing instead of NBS and unstable :( > You need to get the binaries removed *from unstable*; removing them from > testing won't help (and isn't done). > > As a hint, you need to file a bug against the ftp.debian.org > pseudo-package with the subject you used for this mail with the > "/testing" removed. Ok, Done! >> I hope this ping-pong stops soon ;) > >>From the release point of view, everything is done. The package will > automatically migrate once the outdated binaries have been removed. Good! Thank you, Emilio
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
