tag 524588 + patch thanks Hi,
Luk Claes wrote: > So I wanted to request if removing it from testing for now would be an > option? in case anyone is curious about what is required to build, I have attached a diff.gz that fixes the problems under discussion here. I cannot help but note that the overall quality of the module is fairly poor: #495025 raises some doubts, in particular since the classes are not self-contained. It is surprising that a python module segfaulting when not enough parameters are passed to methods is considered to be of adaequate quality for testing or stable when well-established alternatives like PIL exist. The way the python boost detection failure was handled upstream or the arbitrary increasing of the minimal python version is also not exactly confidence-inspiring. Kind regards T. -- Thomas Viehmann, http://thomas.viehmann.net/
pythonmagick_0.9.1-0.1.diff.gz
Description: application/gzip
