On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 07:33:07PM +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > Deng Xiyue wrote: > > Package: dbus > > Version: 1.2.14-2 > > Severity: grave > > > > Dbus 1.2.14-2 failes to install due to start script segmentation fault, > > which makes it half-installed and unusable, hence severity grave. > > Relevant aptitude log as follow: > > > .. > > Starting system message bus: dbus/etc/init.d/dbus: line 89: 20246 > > Segmentation fault start-stop-daemon --start --quiet --pidfile --user > > --exec -- --system > .. > > Architecture: mipsel (mips64) > > I can confirm this problem on mips(el). It seems to be a toolchain issue on > this > architectures: > 1.) The 1.2.12-1 package from the archive works fine. If I recompile it with a > current toolchain on sid, I the get same behaviour. > 2.) Compiling 1.2.14-2 with the lenny toolchain produces working binaries. > > I had a quick discussion with aurel on irc, which confirms that: > > > [16:56] <mbiebl> aurel32: around? > > [16:56] <aurel32> mbiebl: for a few seconds > > [16:56] <mbiebl> need your help with > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=528145 > > [16:57] <mbiebl> looks like dbus-daemon is segfaulting on mipsen > > [16:57] <mbiebl> a backtrace only shows this > > [16:57] <mbiebl> [16:35] <mbiebl> (gdb) run > > [16:57] <mbiebl> [16:35] <mbiebl> Starting program: > > /root/dbus/bus/dbus-daemon > > [16:57] <mbiebl> [16:35] <mbiebl> Program received signal SIGSEGV, > > Segmentation fault. > > [16:57] <mbiebl> [16:35] <mbiebl> 0x2aab55e8 in ?? () from /lib/ld.so.1 > > [16:57] <mbiebl> [16:35] <mbiebl> (gdb) bt full > > [16:57] <mbiebl> [16:35] <mbiebl> #0 0x2aab55e8 in ?? () from /lib/ld.so.1 > > [16:58] <Manoj> Hmm. I take it back. I don't seem to have a .pc file there > > [16:58] <mbiebl> aurel32: interesting fact is, if I recompile dbus 1.2.12-1 > > on a up-to-date sid mips system > > [16:58] <mbiebl> it also segfaults > > [16:58] <mbiebl> whereas the package from the archive works > > [16:58] <mrvn> mbiebl: toolchain bug? > > [16:59] <mbiebl> almost looks like > > [16:59] <aurel32> mbiebl: I'll try to have a look, but I probably won't > > have time until a few days > > [16:59] <aurel32> but it looks like a toolchain bug yes > > [16:59] <mbiebl> aurel32: thanks > > [16:59] <mbiebl> please keep me posted > > > As aurel said, he doesn't have time to look into this immediately. > > That's why I CCed the debian-release team. There are some important rdeps of > dbus, like libgnomevfs2 and gconf2-common. Apparently this leads to build > failures for GNOME packages [1], where dbus is installed as a dependency of > those libs. (I'm still puzzled though, why dbus is started at all. I thought > the > buildds had a policy-rc.d which prevents that). >
Yes, I think that's a bug of the buildd, dbus should not be started in the chroot. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
