On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 10:52:15PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: > + Julian Gilbey (Tue, 07 Apr 2009 19:51:29 +0100): > > > Is there any reason to still be holding back suitesparse from > > migrating to testing (as requested by Adeodato)? It is now the only > > thing, AFAICT, holding back openoffice.org 3.0 from migrating to > > testing. > > suitesparse is going to need manual poking for it to transition, I hope > to get to that on Thursday. In the meantime, while it wasn’t ready, I > added a “block” hint to make britney go faster (so that it doesn’t try > costly updates that are doomed to fail). I’ve removed the unblock now > and added a hint, but it won’t be successful until I can pay closer > attention.
Great, thanks! > + Rafael Laboissiere (Tue, 07 Apr 2009 22:20:46 +0200): > > > * Julian Gilbey <j...@debian.org> [2009-04-07 19:51]: > > > > Is there any reason to still be holding back suitesparse from > > > migrating to testing (as requested by Adeodato)? It is now the only > > > thing, AFAICT, holding back openoffice.org 3.0 from migrating to > > > testing. > > > According to the transitions summary page [1], the package illuminator is > > the only blocker [2]. > > > I do not understand though why this package is taking so long to > > autobuild. Most of the architectures are waiting for libpetsc3.0.0-dev, > > but this package is already built everywhere since one week or so. > > #522764 (and, to a lesser extent, #522699). However, getting illuminator > built wouldn’t buy us much, since it will depend on the new petsc, and > the new petsc is a small transition of its own that I have no idea how > ready it is. > > As I agreed with the Openoffice.org maintainer today, I’ll be pushing > suitesparse without petsc/illuminator before the end of the week, > hopefully on Thursday. Until now we were waiting on, at least, an armel > build of openoffice.org 3.0.1-9. The armel build has now completed. Excited about seeing openoffice 3.0 in testing - thanks for everyone's great work! Julian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
