Hi, BTW, apache 1.3 is not in lenny. Maybe the 1.3 specific parts can be removed?
On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > (Apache2 maintainers, CC'ed, context is #511293.) > elif [ -f /usr/lib/$webserver/modules/libphp5.so ]; then > a2enmod php5 > fi > > ? > > Though if this is indeed the intended way to use it, let's see if > the apache2 maintainers have any comments. The question is if there is actually a good reason for ipplan's postinst to do that. If libapache2-mod-php5 is pulled in by the dependencies, its postinst will activate mod_php in apache2 and ipplan doesn't need to do anything. If php5 is already installed but is not enabled, the admin has manually disabled it and probably had some reason for that. I don't think ipplan should restore the symlink. If you add it, a2enmod is preferred. For mod_actions and mod_cgi, it is less obvious what ipplan's postinst should do. I guess both ways are acceptable. In any case, defining what webapps and apache modules should do in their maintainer scripts is definitely a project for squeeze. Cheers, Stefan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
