Guido Günther wrote: > On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 01:52:47PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote: > [..snip..] >> So including the one in unstable is probably not going to happen. >> Removing 0.4.4 because you're too lame to fix an easy RC bug is also not > Thanks a lot for your kindness. I first requested the move of 0.4.6 to > Lenny about 6 weeks ago. Nobody even bothered to reply, not to that mail > nor to any of the followups.
Sorry, though you send mixed signals and expect us to review a very large diff... >> an option to me... so feel free to propose a tpu upload that would fix >> the RC bug as well as this security issue. > Every bug in the BTS that affected 0.4.6 affects 0.4.4 - there's really > no point in keeping 0.4.4. Please pull it from testing and let's release > without libvirt. What were these about: "Should there be any problems we can easily pull back to 0.4.4" "0.4.4 currently has an (though easy to fix) RC bug, so if the changes >> for 0.4.6 are to intrusive please remove 0.4.4 from Lenny to get rid of >> this issue." Can you please explain what bugs in 0.4.4 are critical enough to not consider a backported fix and remove libvirt from the release, TIA. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
