Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 04:47:02PM +0100, Luk Claes a écrit : >> Charles Plessy wrote: >>> Le Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 04:47:26PM +0100, Thomas Viehmann a écrit : >>>> Charles Plessy wrote: >>>>> Many thanks Thomas for the patch. I have forwarded it Upstream for >>>>> review, in >>>>> case we can get an official blessing before releasing with the patch. >>>>> >>>>> In the absence of a timely answer, I will upload on DELAYED with a >>>>> waiting time >>>>> that leaves next weekend for Wolfram to react. >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Wolfram (the maintainer) actually prepared a fix that was sponsored, which >>> will >>> be unfortunately prevented from migrating to Lenny because of cairomm. I >>> contacted him about this issue but did not get answer yet. >>> >>> Would everybody agree if I sent version 0.46-3 build against Lenny on >>> testing-proposed-updates? >>> >>> The debdiff is attached to this email. It fixes the font issue, plus a >>> problem >>> with Chinese localisation (that I have not studied at all): >> Yes, please upload. > > Sorry for the stupid question that betrays my ignorance: > > which version number is appropriate? Sid is 0.46-3. Although I can't imagine > that it will not be updated until Squeeze, I suppose that we want a version > number that is inferior for Lenny?
We want a version number greater than 0.46-2.1 and smaller than 0.46-3 which was not uploaded to the archive yet (otherwise it would be rejected). An example would be 0.46-2.lenny1. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
