Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 10:57:54PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: >> Luk Claes wrote: >>> t-p-u is a workaround so should only be used if unstable is no option. >>> So if posssible, please use use unstable. >> Actually, there might be a problem because of libpcre3... > > Erm, I was in fact fearing some entanglement, that's why I asked for > t-p-u (even though I didn't check to discover libpcre3 in advance). > > ocamlnet 2.2.9-4 is now in unstable, with urgency high, built on all > arch waiting for an unblock *and* for pcre3 to transition. > > Is pcre3 going to be transitioned?
No, probably not. > If yes please unblock ocamlnet 2.2.9-4 as well. > If not please let me know if I'd go for t-p-u with ocamlnet 2.2.9-4. Please upload it with a lower version to tpu, TIA. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
