On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:00:31PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 03:22:22PM +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > > +Conflicts: autoconf2.13 (<< 2.13-45), libscalar-list-utils-perl (<< > > 1:1.18-1), libxsloader-perl (<< 0.08-1), > > + libcflow-perl (<< 1:0.68-11.1), > > + libqt-perl (<< 3.008-3), > > + libclass-methodmaker-perl (<< 2.10-1), > > + libclearsilver-perl (<< 0.10.4-1.1), > > + libhamlib2-perl (<< 1.2.6.2-6), > > + libsys-cpu-perl (<< 0.40-2.1), > > + megahal (<< 9.1.1a-5), > > + razor (<< 1:2.84-6) > > How was this list composed? It seems to miss e.g. icheck << 0.9.7-6.1 > (I NMUed that one, that's why I noticed).
Thanks for noting this! It was from my lintian bug submission (#463142), but http://lists.debian.org/debian-perl/2008/01/msg00267.html listed quite a few more that were fixed already by then, and icheck and findimagedupes were only found afterwards because their XS modules aren't in /usr/lib/perl5. I went through my bug submissions and all Etch/main packages having usr/lib/perl5/.*\.so without a perlapi or libperl5.8 dependency. Here's an updated list of the conflicts: libcflow-perl (<< 1:0.68-11.1), libqt-perl (<< 3.008-3), libclass-methodmaker-perl (<< 2.10-1), libclearsilver-perl (<< 0.10.4-1.1), libhamlib2-perl (<< 1.2.6.2-6), libsys-cpu-perl (<< 0.40-2.1), libterm-size-perl (<< 0.2-4), libsufary-perl (<< 2.1.1-8), libcrypt-openssl-rsa-perl (<< 0.25-1), libcrypt-openssl-dsa-perl (<< 0.13-3), libcrypt-openssl-random-perl (<< 0.04-1), libcrypt-openssl-bignum-perl (<< 0.04-1), libvideo-ivtv-perl (<< 0.13-6), icheck (<< 0.9.7-6.1), findimagedupes (<< 2.11-2), megahal (<< 9.1.1a-5), razor (<< 1:2.84-6) That makes 17 already. This is getting uglier and uglier; can somebody think of a better way to do this? The libprelude2 and libpreludedb0 packages are somewhat special: the Perl modules have been split into libprelude-perl and libpreludedb-perl after Etch, and I can't see an upgrade path that would keep the Perl bindings installed, so they clearly aren't considered particularly important by the maintainer. So I think we could leave these out: libprelude2 (<< 0.9.12-1), libpreludedb0 (<< 0.9.11.2-1), as well as the still unfixed swish-e... -- Niko Tyni [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
