On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 01:27:57 +0100 Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Hubert Chathi [Sat, 19 Jul 2008 11:35:20 -0400]: > > > How is that? noweb just depends on gawk, iconx, and libc6, and the > > dependency on iconx is unversioned, so shouldn't it be satisfied > > with the version of icon that's in testing? > > There is no noweb in armel in testing, though, so in order to migrate > noweb/2.11b-7/armel, britney wants to migrate iconx/9.4.3-1/armel > first. And see #475952 about that... > > However, since noweb/armel is broken in testing anyway, migrating it > does not makes things worse, so I've added a force hint to let noweb > migrate. OK, thanks. The main reason that I was asking is that noweb in sid fixes a bashism, which is a release goal. None of the other changes is particularly important. -- Hubert Chathi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP/GnuPG key: 1024D/124B61FA http://www.uhoreg.ca/ Fingerprint: 96C5 012F 5F74 A5F7 1FF7 5291 AF29 C719 124B 61FA -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
