Hi, Kurt Roeckx wrote: > On Wed, Jul 02, 2008 at 11:17:49PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > > > > I agree that enough buildd power would be a good thing, but that do > > not mean the ordering should not be tuned. Packages will a lot of > > reverse dependencies, and at least packages with reverse dependencies > > the buildd queue, should be built before their reverse dependencies. > > This is mostly done by ordering the sections. For instance libs
of the source package I assume? > has the highest priority, and is followed by debian-installer, base > (which doesn't exist anymore?) and devel. I mean, when a package has stuff in editors, devel, libs, misc, doc, x11, kde, gnome, python, graphics, net and libdevel where would it stand for buildd ordering? Oh, and I think libdevel is missing in your above list; I think libdevel should be added to that it if isn't already. Regards, Rene -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
