Kyle McMartin wrote: > Anyway, I don't particularly much care for stable releases. I have no > problems with HPPA being punted from lenny and existing only as sid, as > long as people still take patches to fix the issues without the > "release-critical bug" burden over their heads. > > Holding up Debian because of a minority of people with a small amount > of time to work on things doesn't seem entirely fair.
This could mean losing D-I support for hppa. The whole D-I infrastructure is built around having a usable testing. If hppa abandons stable releases and thus is no longer included in testing, I personally will immediately stop investing any energy in hppa D-I and may argue for dropping it, especially if nobody else takes any interest. I also doubt that Debian in general will allow architectures to only have a presence in unstable. It's much more likely that hppa would at some point be relegated to http://www.debian-ports.org/. Cheers, FJP
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
