On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 05:25:23PM -0300, Nelson A. de Oliveira wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, 03 Jun 2008 09:37:53 +0200 > Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > "Nelson A. de Oliveira" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Something says to me that the answer will be "Sorry, too late", but > > > is it a possibility (time is short, I know) to have an ImageMagick > > > transition (with soname and package names changes)? > > > > Why is it needed? New, regular upstream release, or something worse? > > While basically it's a new upstream release, there are 25+ bug fixes > (if comparing the new version available at experimental against the > current one available at testing/unstable) and a cleaner and more > elaborated package. >
Any idea how many packages this will affect, and how many of these will now FTBFS? ImageMagick isn't famed for it's stable ABIs... :) Neil -- <tore> Jump in and have a quim!
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
