Am Montag, den 02.06.2008, 09:16 -0700 schrieb Kevin B. McCarty: > Adeodato Simó wrote: > > > However, I'm not sure who mentioned this possibility, but shipping > > /usr/lib/libexpat.so.0 within wink sounds very ugly to me. > > It was me that suggested it ... > > > If upstream > > won't update their binary, and you want to drop the symlink, on possible > > solution is that wink ships a symlink in /usr/lib/wink/libexpat.so.0, > > and uses LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/usr/lib/wink from the /usr/bin/wink wrapper > > script. > > ... but I agree that this proposal is much better, especially since > /usr/bin/wink is already a wrapper script anyway.
It is the solution, Daniel Baumann - the wink maintainer - accepted. The fix has been uploaded today. So an update of libexpat dropping the symlink should be possible now. Regards, Daniel -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
