Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:55:43PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote: >> Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 10:31:20PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: >>>> * Dirk Eddelbuettel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [080602 22:24]: >>> Now, as this has been fixed via give-back, we still do NOT know why >>> Lamont sees the package as shipped whereas the other side does not. >>> Ideas, anyone? >> You might want to read before answering: the give-back happened after >> your first mail, *everyone* sees the package as installed since lamont's >> upload *after* the give-back was installed. > > There is no need for attitude, Luk. I am aware of the timeline. I > was just trying to give color to Andi.
Andi was probably doing the give-back... > I as maintainer have been stuck with this package being lost between > the port and the archive for six weeks now. > > I could just be an pain in the arse, increment the debian revision and push a > rebuild -- but that's a technical non-solution to an issue that > _still_ nobody has addressed. Why did drop between the cracks? Something went wrong with the upload from the buildd to the archive, I wouldn't be surprised if that would be due to hardware problems at the time. > Or -- is it fine to call it a Heisenbug, and in the future I just > torment you guys with rebuilds-across-all-arches at will? Just let me > know... As mentioned before, you should contact the buildd maintainer in such case: <arch>@buildd.debian.org Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
