On 2008-03-18 Luk Claes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Gerrit Pape wrote: > > Hi, the lenny-migration update script currently considers the > > daemontools and ucspi-tcp packages 'out of date'. The packages in > > unstable introduced the software into Debian/main, AFAIK there were no > > previous versions in testing (an ucspi-tcp source package was available > > in Debian/non-free, but has been renamed to ucspi-tcp-src). Can anyone > > take a look to have them properly migrated?
> Out of date means that they are not built on all architectures yet... as > this is a precondition for them to transition to testing, this has > indeed not happened yet... Hello Luk, Unless this has changed recently this wording is not completely correct. Testing migration used to require that all binaries of testing candidate architectures were in sync, i.e. built from the same source version. It is perfectly fine to have a package only available on i386 and amd64 e.g. Please correct me if I am wrong. daemontools fulfills this requirement: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ dak ls daemontools daemontools | 1:0.76-2 | unstable | source, alpha, amd64, hurd-i386, i386, ia64, m68k, powerpc, s390, sparc Bitney thinks otherwise, though: http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=daemontools daemontools is not yet built on i386: 0.76-9 vs 1:0.76-2 (missing 2 binaries: daemontools, daemontools) It seems to mix up the new package daemontools (binaries daemontools-run and daemontools, version 1:0.76-2) and the old contrib packages daemontools-installer (binary daemontools-installer, removed from sid and lemnny, version 0.76-9 is in etch and oldstable). cu andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure' -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
