Frans Pop wrote: > Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: >> I am aware of this, but believe you do not have to worry as much as >> you do. As far as I can see all of your problems originated from the >> lvm2 script missing headers, and my bad decision to drop override >> files for packages with headers in unstable, while forgetting to make >> sure those headers were also making it to testing before the new >> version of insserv. > > Sure, I'm aware of all that. However, that does not take away my general > impression that insserv is not stable, mature and tested enough to be > promoted to the default mechanism. > > You've done a huge amount of work on this, and I for one appreciate that. > But IMO insserv needs a bit more time and development before we can trust > our whole distro to it. > > But that's all it is: my opinion. I hope some others who have done similar > testing will speak up as well, so the final decision can be based on more > than just your opinion as maintainer and mine.
Note that the Release Team's understanding of the Release Goal is making it possible to switch to a dependency based boot system, not making it the default... So for the latter you'll still need to persuade us... :-) Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
