Steve Langasek a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 16, 2007 at 02:20:42AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >> Given the listing on <http://packages.debian.org/sid/libsigc++0c2>, it >> looks like affected archs are actually: amd64, arm, armel, m68k, s390. > > FWIW, I don't have access to wanna-build for armel; you'll need to contact > the armel porters separately about binNMUs for that arch.
I have just scheduled the binNMU for armel. >> I guess that the suggested binNMU-round should fix this: >> xgsmlib_0.2-7, 2, Rebuild against libsigc++, amd64 arm armel m68k >> s390 >> shaketracker_0.4.6-5, 2, Rebuild against libsigc++, amd64 >> shaketracker_0.4.6-5, 3, Rebuild against libsigc++, arm armel m68k s390 >> libicq2000_0.3.2-7, 1, Rebuild against libsigc++, amd64 arm armel m68k >> s390 >> ickle_0.3.2-7, 1, Rebuild against libsigc++, amd64 arm armel m68k >> s390 >> gtkguitune_0.7-7, 2, Rebuild against libsigc++, amd64 arm armel m68k >> s390 >> gabber_0.8.8-9.1, 2, Rebuild against libsigc++, amd64 arm armel m68k >> s390 > > Scheduled, thanks. -- .''`. Aurelien Jarno | GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 : :' : Debian developer | Electrical Engineer `. `' [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] `- people.debian.org/~aurel32 | www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
