On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 06:42:46PM +0000, Bernd Zeimetz wrote: > Hi, > > > Now, for the bad news. The following packages have various kinds of > > issues that prevent them from working with python2.5. Some of them are > > trivial, some are much more tricky. In all cases, we need to focus on > > these bugs if we want to see those packages in lenny: > > You have missed Zope.
Zope is kind of outside the python policy because it always lags behind, and is dealt with in its own round, I presume that's why Joss didn't talked about it. > Does the list include those packages which are not conform to the new > Python policy? There're still several of them out there. A zero-day NMU > policy would be good to have here, too. > http://bugs.debian.org/from:[EMAIL PROTECTED];pend-exc=done;exclude=fixed Last time I checked, most of them weren't in testing for ages. But this wasn't thorough. > > Please note that they can all be binNMUed after python2.5 has become the > > default, but all of them will have to migrate to testing at once. We > > must make this list shorter unless we want this transition to recall bad > > memories to the release team. > > > mod-wsgi > > It's not possible to use more than one python version with mod-wsgi, > therefore it will only work and be build against the default python > version. A binNMU after changing the version should work well. yes, for some packages it makes sense, Joss didn't asked for an empty list, merely a shorter one, and I agree with him. -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O [EMAIL PROTECTED] OOO http://www.madism.org
pgpp93vOIZmVv.pgp
Description: PGP signature
