On Sun, Jul 19, 2026 at 05:51:32PM +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote: >... > * Sebastian Ramacher <[email protected]> [2026-07-19 15:54]: >... > > FTBFS under a different nice level than on buildds is an important bug > > at most. But as FTBFS on r.d.n is now causing packages to be blocked > > from migrating to testing, please remove this variation. > > I think that can be argued both ways and I am also fine with dropping it. > Added Holger as he is in charge of this.
The basic rule is that FTBFS on our buildds are RC, and FTBFS that only happen in other environments are not RC. Otherwise we would be back at the point of endless discussions around claims that FTBFS that only happen on single-core machines would be RC. IMHO (not a member of the release team) reproducible rebuilds with nocheck would be a difference that might make sense both for build stability and build time at some point, but right now it's likely best to try to minimize differences. > Cheers Jochen cu Adrian
