Hi, On Sun Jun 10, 2007 at 10:44:33 -0600, dann frazier wrote: > On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 06:14:48PM +0200, Julien Danjou wrote: > > At 1181466754 time_t, Lo??c Minier wrote: > > > Hey, > > > > > > I've uploaded madwifi_0.9.2+r1842.20061207-2etch1 prepared by Kel > > > Modderman with the attached interdiff; it contains security fixes. > > > Please review and accept. > > > > Why is this not handled by security team? > > They've asked the security team a number of times for an > update. Though the security team may have never formally said 'no' for > this one, I have seen members assert before that non-free updates need > to go through SRM. In lieu of a formal response from the security team > (I was not a member then), I sent the madwifi maintainers the > following response last time they asked: > > On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 11:13:47AM -0600, dann frazier wrote: > > hey Kel, > > I've seen other people on the security team suggest that non-free > > updates go in via a stable update. In which case, I suggest forwarding > > this onto debian-release as described here: > > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2007/04/msg00005.html > > Of course, the security FAQ suggests that the security team *would* > normally release advisories for non-free stuff, if someone else does > the rest of the work: > http://www.debian.org/security/faq#contrib > > I'm now on the security team and I don't mind doing this advisory, > assuming there's no objections from the security team - nor do I have > any objections about introducing these fixes via stable instead.
it was already uploaded to stable and i marked it as accepted. if you want to issue a DSA for it, please tell me within 30min. Otherwise, too late. Greetings Martin -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] /root]# man real-life No manual entry for real-life -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
