On Mon, 02 Mar 2026, Don Armstrong wrote:n > On Sun, 01 Mar 2026, Don Armstrong wrote: > > Hrm; that's concerning. I have some theories, but I need to look into > > it more. [My first thought is that for some reason when bugscan ran, > > the package showed up as absent in unstable, so the versioning > > incorrectly indicated that the bug wasn't present in unstable, but I > > need to look at this more closely to see if that's what is going on.] > > I'm now able to replicate this by running make-britney-counts on the > appropriate status file. I'm not sure why the code is failing for that > particular status and not failing for others, but I will check it out > as soon as I can.
I've now addressed this issue in 2202a6a[1]. In short, in some cases the first bug was skipped if the last package in the package did not have a section. This bug has been there for quite some time, so it probably accounts for 1 missing bug every few hundred (or thousand) runs. 1: https://salsa.debian.org/debbugs-team/bugscan/-/commit/2202a6ac6e192be43058ab732c78f8b8cf907c5b -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be. -- Douglas Adams _The Long Dark Tea-Time of the Soul_
